Advanced Search Options

Use these options to search the full archive.

Search guidelines
Displaying 6276 to 6300 of 14172 matched results

Letter – Henry Richmond to Walter Blackett – 22 Dec 1761

To Sir Wr Blackett Bt. M.P. to be left at the Cocoa tree in Pall Mall London 22nd December 1761 Hon[ou]rd Sir Edw[ar]d Fenwicks pedigree, as given to you at first, was <….[ripped]> his g[ran]f father married Mary, Daughter of Sir Fra[nci]s Liddell whose wife was <….[ripped]> to Sir Richd. Stote. But it is now removed a degree further back. For Mr Robson

Letter – Henry Richmond to Nicholas Halhead – 24 Dec 1761

To Nich[ola]s Halhead Esqr. in Durham Newcastle 24th December 1761 Sir On Fryday last I rec[iev]ed your Favour of the 14th inst in answer to my Letter of the 13th Octo[be]r inclosing the Depositions. I observe you say the present moor masters Lease is dated the 29th Aug[u]st 1732 but it is dated the 6th April 1750, having been renewed with Bishop Charles in London, & the Lives are all in being. With regard to

Letter – Joseph Richmond to Richard Wilson – 25 Dec 1761

To Richd. Wilson Esqr. at Leeds Yorkshire 25th December 1761 Sir I rec[iev]ed the favour of your Lre last post advising your receipt of mine of the 11th inst. I am sorry I sho[ul]d have given you so much trouble, wch I hope you will excuse as the bill was at so short a date. Mr James King has built nothing at Kenton but a Cottage for a tenant that has taken his share of the West farm & he seems to have laid aside the thoughts of build

Letter – Joseph Richmond to William Darwin – 25 Dec 1761

To Mr. Wm. Alvey Darwin 25th December 1761 Grays Inn London Sir Inclosed you receive two bills as above for £335.8s.0d the re[ceip]t of wch you will please to advise me of, & place them to acco[un]t with Sr. Wr Blackett tow[ar]ds making the quarterly payments. & in your Lre of advice I desire you will mention that you have rec[iev]ed them for that purpose, that it may be a proper voucher for me. P.S. I am sorry you sho[

Letter – Joseph Richmond to Plumb and Brown – 25 Dec 1761

1761 Dec 25th Advised Messrs Plumb & Browne of the foregoing dra[ugh]t on them of this date

Letter – Henry Richmond to Walter Blackett – 26 Dec 1761

To Sir Walter Blackett Bt. M.P. to be left at the Cocoa tree in Pall mall London 26th December 1761 Hon[ou]rd Sir Mr Wm Featherston died on Wednesday night of a Dropsy. People speak variously of the circumstances in wch he has left his family: & therefore as he owed you £135 for 4 & ½ years rent for Kenton Hall, Stone Close, etc due at Martin[ma]s last I d

Letter – Henry Richmond to Walter Blackett – 28 Dec 1761

To Sir Wr. Blackett Bt. MP to be left at the Cocoa tree in Pall Mall London 28th December 1761 Hon[ou]rd Sir It seems now to be the General opinion that Mr Featherston’s Effects will not be sufficient to pay his Debts. Therefore, as there is at present Enough upon the farm at Kenton to pay you & as in case an Execution sho[ul]d come ag[ain]st the Goods there you would only get one y[ea]rs rent out of the 4 & ½ y[ea]rs rent due at Martin[ma]s you will please to consider

Letter – Henry Richmond to Walter Blackett – 29 Dec 1761

To Sir Wr. Blackett Bt. as above 29 December 1761 Hon[ou]rd Sir Mr John Cookson tells me that it is not Mr Dixon but himself that is to assist Mrs Featherston, & that Mr Stewart is to collect the acco[un]t of the debts. I find by him, ie Mr Cookson, that the debts already known amount to above £10000 & that he does not think there will be enough to pay the cred[ito]rs. Please therefore to consider whe[the]r it is prop

Letter – Henry Richmond to Revd Naylor – 1 Jan 1762

To The Rev[eren]d Mr Naylor in Morpeth Newcastle 1st January 1762 Sir, Sir Walter Blackett wrote to me sometime ago to enquire if any clergyman in this neighbourhood wanted a curate, for he has a young man at the University, whom he could wish to have provided for, in that way, for the present. I therefore take the Liberty of Enquiring of you, whether the report that Mr Coxon is to have the Living of Sunderland, & that you will want a cura

Letter – Henry Richmond to Collingwood Forster – 1 Jan 1762

1762 January 1st Wrote Mr Coll[ingwood] Forster inclosing him the rec[eip]t wch he left with me for £12.15s.0d wch sum I paid him the 28 ult[im]o he having now sent me his bill (wch he had then forgot) with a proper receipt thereon. HR

Letter – Henry Richmond to Walter Blackett – 3 Jan 1762

To Sir Wr. Blackett Bt. MP to be left at the Cocoa tree in Pall Mall London Newcastle Sunday 3rd January 1762 Hon[ou]rd Sir I am sorry we cannot at present remit any more money nor pay the the dra[ugh]ts you propose to Mr Bell without putting off the mills pay, wch I suppose you wo[ul]d not chuse. I wrote you sometime ago that this pay wch sho[ul]d be made in March, wo[ul]d come to £3000 but f[ro]m the acco[un]ts wch are now sent in I judge it wi

Letter – Henry Richmond to Walter Blackett – 6 Jan 1762

To Sir Wr Blackett Bt MP to be left at the Cocoa tree in Pall mall London 6 January 1762 Hon[ou]rd Sir Pursuant to your directions, of securing the rent due from the late Mr Featherston in the civilest manner, I put off distraining till Mr John Cookson came to Town on Monday: when I acquainted him of what was intended, & desired that, if proper security co[ul]d not be given, such horses might be pointed out to be seize

Letter – Henry Richmond to Isaac Hunter – 7 Jan 1762

To Mr Isaac Hunter at Dukesfield Newcastle 7th January 1762 [1763] Sir/ Jos & John Angus Junr have been with me today & repent they did not take the Farm as I offered it to them on the 27th Nov last. I do not know where you have let it/ as was agreed when you were here last/ to Walton; if you have I hope you have done it pursuant to my Lre on the 10 Decr. John Angus Junr says his Father declares he will keep the Farm till Mayday 1764, wch to be

Letter – Henry Richmond to William Fenwick – 8 Jan 1762

To Wm. Fenwick Esq at Bywel[l] 8 January 1762 Sir In our last conversation about the Tack wch you wanted Sir Walter Blackett to grant you of a Lead mine that you were not willing to name or point out, I told you that provided it was not in Kilhope Fell & provided it was not any mine wrought hitherto, nor cuts off, nor interferes with any present workings, Sir Walter was willing to grant It. And that one thing more, necessary to be kn

Letter – Henry Richmond to Walter Blackett – 12 Jan 1762

To Sir Wr Blackett Bt MP at the Cocoa tree in Pall mall London 12th January 1762 Hon[ou]rd Sir At Mayday next you will have had Mr Fenwicks £2000 four years the int[e]r[es]t paid him at first was 4 p[er] c[en]t; but f[ro]m Mayday 1760 it was advanced to 4 ¼ & f[ro]m Mayday last to 4 ½. The pres[en]t situation of affairs < & ray> make it prudent to comply with the further advance to 4 ¾ p[er] c[en]t provided he will let it remain quietly for the term o

Letter – Henry Richmond to Thomas Maughan – 13 Jan 1762

To Mr. Thos. Maughan at Newhouse, Weardale 13 January 1762 Sir Sir Walter has got L[or]d Darlingtons Leave for Mr Elliot to attend the Reference about the dispute with Mr Bacon. I expected before this to have heard something f[ro]m you about this affair. I mean 1st whe[the]r the ore was brought back; for without that, you know, you are not to agree to the Referees meeting 2dly. what points you & Mr Harrison think ought to be refered. Th

Letter – Henry Richmond to Walter Blackett – 15 Jan 1762

To Sir Wr. Blackett M.P. at the Cocoa tree in Pall Mall London 15th January 1762 Hon[ou]rd Sir Mr Davison, whom I saw last week, said he thought the ore had been brought back, & promised. if it was not done already, it sho[ul]d be done directly. On the 15th of last month I desired Mr Harrison to join Mr Maughan in considering what points were proper to be laid before the Referees, & that they wo[ul]d both take care that nothing wch was clearly your Righ

Letter – Henry Richmond to Nicholas Halhead – 18 Jan 1762

To Nicholas Halhead Esq in Durham 18 January 1762 Sir Those who are placed in different Stations see objects in different lights; and so you think Sir Wr Blacketts Agents are blameable for what they think they are justifyable in. For my part, I acknowledge, I cannot see that any opportunity of renewing the Lease for years upon reasonable Terms has yet been let slip. Nor do I think such an opportunity could ever present itself w

Letter – Henry Richmond to Thomas Maughan – 21 Jan 1762

To Mr Thos. Maughan at Newhouse in Weardale 21st January 1762 Sir I have just now rec[eiv]ed your Lre of the 18th inst & think you are right as to the points wch are proper to be refered. However it will be better to have Mr Harrisons opinion joined with yours & reduced into writing for Sir Walters Satisfaction. I am sorry they have not yet got the ore bro[ugh]t back; however as the weather will not, you say permit them to do it now, it m

Letter – Henry Richmond to Walter Blackett – 23 Jan 1762

To Sir Wr. Blackett Bt. MP at the Cocoa tree on Pall Mall, London Newca 23rd January 1762 Hon[ou]rd Sir Inclosed is a copy of a Lre I rec[eiv]ed f[ro]m Mr. Halhead & of what I wrote him in return. I waited on him at Durham on Wednesday last to see the Indubitable authority wch he mentioned & found it was no more than the Enrolment of the Lease of the inclosures to Wm. Hall in 1661, exactly in the same words as the pres[en]t Lease of the inclosures to you, & that

Letter – Henry Richmond to Thomas Maughan – 28 Jan 1762

To Mr Thos. Maughan at Newhouse Weardale Newcastle 28 January 1762 Sir Mr Fenwick of Bywel, or some person properly authorized by him will, I expect call upon you soon about taking the Tack of a Leadmine; but they don’t chuse to mention the place where it lyes, tho’ I think they ought at least to mention the Fell. This is so Loose a way of letting a Tack that I think it will be necessary for you to insert such limitations as the following, to wit In any place in W

Letter – Henry Richmond to Thomas Maughan – 4 Feb 1762

To Mr Thos. Maughan at Newhouse Weardale Newcastle 4th February 1762 Sir As Sir Walter has told me he will allow me a clerk; & you were speaking of a son of the late Mr Peart’s, whom you were desirous of putting soon to some business, I shall be glad you will let me know what age he is; & that, if you have not already provided for him, you will bring him hither as soon you come, that I may be able to judge whether he will do. In the mean time, I would

Letter – Henry Richmond to Nicholas Walton – 9 Feb 1762

To Mr Nicholas Walton at Farnacres Newca 9 February 1762 Sir I want much to know the price at wch Lead ore has been sold by the Bing every year for 18 y[ea]rs past; & cannot think of anyone who can inform me of this so well as yourself. If therefore you will be so good as, at your Leisure to give me the prices at wch your dues have sold each year for the above 18 years I shall be very much obliged to you & am etc HR

Letter – Henry Richmond to Richard Harrison – 10 Feb 1762

Mr Richard Harrison at Coalcleugh Sir I am very glad that the dispute about Cowhaust has been determined as you mention. And that you go on so hopefully with Coalcleugh. As to Moohope, we will defer the consideration of her till you come hither, & we have Sir Walters directions. If anything offers, suitable for your son in Law, I shall do all I can for him. I wish I had known before that he is so well qualified for business as you say he is I am etc HR

Letter – Henry Richmond to Walter Blackett – 27 Feb 1762

To Sir Wr Blackett Bt. at Wallington Newca 27 February 1762 past 3 o’clock Hon[ou]rd Sir I have just now heard that the mail wch was dispatched last night from the post office here with the Newcastle Letters for London was lost in Birtley Lane: of which Accident I think it necessary to acq[uain]t you as I was told Jack Smith bro[ugh]t some Letters f[ro]m Wallington for London I am etc HR
The Dukesfield Smelters and Carriers Project aimed to celebrate and discover the heritage of the Dukesfield Arches & lead carriers' routes between Blaydon and the lead mines of Allendale and Weardale. A two year community project, it was led by the Friends of the North Pennines in partnership with Hexhamshire and Slaley Parish Councils and the active support of Allendale Estates. It was funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund and the generous support of other sponsors. Friends of the North Pennines: Charity No:1137467