Arthur Mowbray Esq. Newcastle 18 January 1799
Durham
Inclosed you will receive a Bill drawn by Mess. Surtees Burdon & Co. on Messrs Barclays & Co. at One Month dated this day for Seventy Five Pounds One Shilling & Two Pence being in full for half a Y[ea]rs Rent due from T. R. Beaumont Esq. the 1st Feby next to the Lord Bishop of Durham for the Office of Moor Master of Weardale, with 1s/2d for Acquit [an]ce of Duty
Mr Thomas Emerson NCastle 19 January 1799
Newhouse, Weardale Durham
In a letter that I had from Mr Mowbray he appears to be hurt that nothing was said by you at the Meeting in favour of the Division, which he said caused it to be thought that Col Beaumont was not Friendly to the measure & requested me to write to you & set that matter right, I acquainted him that in case of there being an express Clause in the Bi
Col Beaumont NCastle 20 Jany. 1799
MP Portman square London
D[ea]r Sir I wrote to you the 13th Inst to which give me leave to refer you. Mr Williamson who attended the Meeting in Weardale respecting the Division informs me that great opposition was made by the small Free & Copyholders to the Division of the Commons of Stanhope & Bollihope, tho’ the principle Proprietors were for the Division taking place no o
Sherburn 21. Jany. 1799.
My Lord
Herewith I send a Copy of Mr. Blacketts Answer to my Letter of which I sent your Lordship a Copy - & also a Copy of a printed Letter I yesterday received from The Dean & Chapter as one of their Lessees. I have by the Post Remitted Five Hundred pounds to Messrs Drummonds, to be passed to the Credit of your Lordship’s Accompt.
I am My Lord Your Lordship’s very much obd. ob. Hble Servant
Arthur Mowbray
The Honbl. &am
Mr Archb[ol]d Paris. Newcastle 21st January 1799
No. 7 New Bond Street, London
Sir, I am favoured with your letter of the 17th Inst, & observe the Contents - I have within these few Months sold a very considerable quantity of Lead to the London Houses of great respectability at £17 P[er] F[odde]r half refined, & half Common, payable in Bills on London due in six Months from the Day of the sale, a great part of whi
Mr William Tweedale Bretton Near Wakefield Yorkshire
[up to first 10 lines missing, cut out] I have continued to pay I. Littlewood since I saw you at this place. I don’t perceive that any thing has been paid by the Overseers of Rexborough on her Account for some time by Mr Straker’s papers, the only one that I have seen relating to it is a Copy of a letter to Mr Noble, (a Copy of which you have on the other side) & if nothing has been paid since, the Arrears now due will be in all
Newhouse Jan 23 1799
Sir,
I should have wrote you last week relative to the Meeting at Stanhope but I expected Mr Williamson would have informed you of the particulars of the said Meeting -- It is said if the Intended Division get forward, that Colonel Beaumont will not have the priviledge of discovering and Working Veins by hushing, should that be the case, he should not be deprived the liberty of hushing Wastes as it is not only the best way of working them, but also does leas
Jan 25th 99
My dear Sir
I have very great pleasure in informing You that Mrs Beaumont has this Morning presented me with a Son, I have great Satisfaction in saying that both She & the dear Babe are as well as can be expected. I will be much obliged to You to let it be inserted in the Newcastle papers. I send you a letter from Mr Hind, he is determined not to loose sight of any opportunity of offering himself. Mrs Beaumont unites with me in best respects to Yourself & Mrs Collin
Threepwood 25th January 1799
My Lord,
I trust your Lordship will have the goodness to excuse my addressing you on the subject of the proposed Division of the Commons and Stinted Pastures in the Parish of Stanhope in Weardale, in which Division being a considerable Proprietor, I crave leave to express a due sense of the various advantages the Proprietors generally are likely to experience from Your Lordships indulgence and liberality of Sentiment, not only towards Enfranchising th
Dear Sir,
I had an opportunity of seeing Mr Blackett soon after my return from Stanhope and stated to him that it was intended to secure to Col. Beaumont his right as Lessee of the Bishop of Durham to work the lead mines in the stinted pastures & stinted moors without paying any damages for spoil of ground, and I also suggested to him that, as it appeared to me that a very considerable number of the persons interested in the division at present kept aloof merely from want of knowing
(Copy)
Stanhope Feby 4th 1799
Dear Sir,
I take the liberty of forwarding to you a Copy of two Questions that I sent to Mr Williamson together with a Copy of his Answer from which it will clearly appear, I trust, that I could not consistently with prudence, or as an honest Trustee for my Successors, consent to partial Allotments, or to a partial Sale of Tithes even for an equivalent in Land
I am, Dear Sir, your most obedient humble servant,
H. Hardinge
To Mr Sc
Mr Thomas Emerson Newcastle 26 January 1799
Newhope, near Stanhope Weardale
I received your l[ett]er of the 23rd Inst. & I observe what you say as to your doubts of Col. Beaumont not having (in Case of a Division taking Place) the priviledge & advantage of discovering New Veins by Flushing, I have had a good deal of Conversation with Mr Williamson on this business, He recommends that no notice be taken in the Bil
Colonel Beaumont MP NCastle 27 Jany. 1799
Portman square London
D[ea]r Sir I wrote to you of the 20th Inst. to which I refer you, I have since had a good deal of Conversation with Mr Williamson respecting the Division of the Commons & Stinted Pastures in Weardale, he is of opinion that a Clause in the Bill giving you (as Lessee under the B[isho]p) full power to work etc the Mines within the Stinted Pastures, as well as t
H[ouse of] C[ommons].
My dear Sir,
In a letter from Mr Bell today he informs me of the Death of Mr Bushby in Confidence, I ask You whether You think the Brother of <Kit> Blackett, Mr Fleming of Houghton Le Spring, who keeps a School would be a proper person to succeed to the Curacy. He being well qualified as a Schoolmaster for to Serve the purpose, & I should hope the Trustees for the School would have no objection in case such Appointment should take place to give up the School t
Messrs. Read Lucas & Reads NCastle 28 Jany. 1799
Sheffield
Gent[lemen] I have this day received your letter of the 26 Inst. covering Six Bills, Am[oun]t £375-10-6 as you advise & which are placed to your Credit for fine Silver sent you. I have now on hand about 50 tons of good Test Bottoms which you may have at £3-3- P[er] Ton you paying all expence in Shipping etc which will be about 2/-s P[er] Ton for Labourage & Keel
Dr Sir,
Yours dated the 26th inst I rec’d last night the Land Tax for Lintzgarth is allowed but not for Crook Oak. There are no other Estates in Rookhope but Lintzgarth that comes into my rental that pays Land Tax. The Redburn Mr Bell has the management of, I have sent a Servant to him acquainting him with the purport of your Letter
I am in haste Yr Obt Servt I Hunter
Dukesfd 30 Jan 1799
Mr. Tho Crawhall Col Beaumont’s office Westgate St, N’castle
My dear Sir
I have very great pleasure in saying that Mrs Beaumont & the Child are going on very well. I am very glad You have retained Mr Williamson he certainly is a very sensible clever man. When the Bill is brought into the House, who is the person who will bring it in. it must I suppose go into a Committee, when the Clauses there can be agreed upon, but previous to its being presented if you will let me know the Solicitors I can consult with them what steps they would have me take. We
Cav[endish Square] 1 Feb
Sir,
In giving my assent to the Weardale Inclosure I flattered myself that it w[oul]d not only benefit the County Palatine & the Parties concerned, but that if w[oul]d essentially promote the cause of Religion & Virtue & the welfare of the poor in that extensive district. The first object has in my opinion been very properly attended to in the proposed inclosure; as the interests of the Parties (as far as my information extends) have been fair
J Tweddell Esq. Newcastle 4th February 1799
Threepwood near Hexham Northumberland
D[ea]r Sir
Col Beaumont was favoured with your letter of the 25th Ult. but not being fully informed of the progress that had been made in the Bill for the Division of the Commons & Stinted Pastures in Weardale, he has desired me to answer your letter. This Division nearly concerns Col Beaumont as Lessee under the Lord Bishop of
The Parish of Stanhope is situated in the western part of the Co. of Durham, and contains by Estimation 70,400 acres at present it is presumed nearly 70,000 are in Grass, which never has been ploughed, being chiefly Commonable. The Bill now pending in Parliament if carried into a Law will loosen the ties of Bondage, give liberty to Industry, Encourage, and Comfort the poor. Of late years the Mines of Lead, chiefly in the western part, have been worked considerably which has caused Numbers
My Lord
The inclosed is a Copy of a letter I have received from Mr Hardinge requesting that I would cause a Copy to be transmitted to your Lordship which I take the earliest opportunity of doing, I am
My Lord, Your Lordships highly obliged and devoted Servant
R. Scruton
Durham
12th February 1799
Cav[endish] Square Feb 16
Dear Sir,
I inclose herewith a draft of my intended letter to Mr Scruton as Solicitor of the Weardale Inclosure Bill. Should any parts of it appear to Mrs Beaumont & you to require explanation I shall be very in waiting upon you to give it. If the outline which I have sketched meets your joint approbation you will have the goodness to signify it to your agents, & to express a wish that they would convey to your dependents in Weardale your concurr
Colonel Beaumont Newcastle 17th February 1799
MP Portman square London
D[ea]r Sir I wrote to you the 15th Inst. to which I refer you. I understand that Mr Fleming has given up all thoughts of the School at Hexham; On his application to the Trustees a Majority of them were in his favour, but meeting with unfriendly Opposition from a quarter where he had not the least reason to expect it, induced him to drop all further
Cav[endish Square]: Square Feb 21st 1799
Dear Sir,
I should much earlier have returned my thanks for the very handsome manner in which you expressed your approbation of my conduct [in] relation to the Weardale Inclosure, both at Stanhope and in your letter to me, had I not waited the arrival of the Petition. It has been presented to The House of Commons; and I have to acquaint you that it is now my intention to address a letter to Mr Scruton as Solicitor of the bill, to be commun
Colonel Beaumont Newcastle 23 February 1799
MP Portman square London
D[ea]r Sir I was favoured with your letter of the 16th Inst. enclosing Mr Heron’s letter to you; the Opinion that he gave you with respect to the Division is certainly very just & proper, the Bishop may be disposed to do what is right, but it does not yet appear that all the Copyholders are equally well disposed to acquiesce with rights that you