- Transcription
- Comments (0) Change font
If columns/tables do not appear straight, change font
George Brooks Esqr Green Street Hexham Abbey 5th Febry 1783 Grosvenor Square London Sir I was astonished at receiving a Letter from Mr Aldn Blackett the other day intimating that a mistake had happened between Mr Dew & me respecting the Renewal of Lintzgarth & Kilhope & Welhope Leases. On Thursday the 5th of Decemr last about Ten o’Clock in the Morning I waited upon Mr Dew at Bp Auckland & acquainted him that I came on behalf of Sir Thomas Blackett to treat with about the Renewal of the Leases of Lintzgarth Kilhope & Welhope. Mr Dew then said I must furnish him with a Rental wch I accordingly did & gave him the Rental of Lintzgarth first which I aver to be no more than £10 a Year but he seemed not satisfied with it & looked at his Books where he found that £14 had been paid for putting in a Life in that Lease in the Year 1760 & he said tho’ he must acknowledge that Land was perhaps 25p Ct lower than a few Years ago yet the Lord Bishop of Durham had never come down in his Fines, to which I replied that Sir Thomas would never differ with His Lordship for so small a Sum as £4 & therefore would agree to give £14 the Sum paid on the last Renewal which was assented to by Mr Dew. I then at his Request gave him the Rental of Kilhope & Welhope which is £88.17s.6d out of wch deduct £1.7s.8d the Rent paid annually to his Lordship & there will remain £86.19s.10d the Net Yearly Rent which was agreed to be paid for the Renewal of the last mentioned Estates. I then asked Mr Dew what Sum his Lordship would require for Exchanging a Life & he answered half the Sum for putting in a Life. I then took Pen & Ink & put down in my Book in Mr Dews Office £ s d For putting in a Life in Lintzgarth Lease 14. 0. 0 For Exchanging a Life 7. 0. 0 £21. 0. 0 For putting in a Life in the Lease of Kilhope & Welhope 86.19.10 For Exchanging a Life 43. 9. 9 £130.9. 9 Now this seems rational for as no more than a Years Rent was ever asked or paid for putting in a Life in the Place of one that was dead certainly Exchanging a Life cannot with Propriety be valued so high for various Reasons. How the mistake you mention has happened I cannot tell but with great Deference to Mr Dew & yourself I assert it never could have been agreed on the part of Sir Thomas Blackett to have given 3 Years Rent for the putting in a new Life and Exchanging one. By your mode you Charge 1 Years Rent for the new Life & two Years for the Exchange when the Exchange as I have said before for various Reasons ought to have been less than the new Life. I am etc John Bell